Korean Popular Culture

The Textbook-in-progress of the Ivy League's first class on the Korean Wave. This blog is the work of University of Pennsylvania EALC 198/598 students (Spring 2006 & 2007). Please apply proper citation when using any part of this blog. For details on citing this site see: http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/online/cite5.html#1

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Gymnastics fall from fame

I will admit that football, soccer, basketball, basically jock sports in general usually trigger a snooze button in my mind, but gymnastics has always been a thrilling event for me especially the previous olympic games in 2004. Unfortunately, Korean female artistic gymnastics is usually not up to par, but the men's gymnastics is outstanding. I remember the contraversy two years ago dealing with Paul Hamm and Yang Tae-young. I first remember being impressed by the extraordinary skills the Koreans possessed and not recalling their talent in the past. My first instinct was to cheer for the United States (obviously), Romania, and China since their women's teams are phenominal. However, the men's Korean team took me by surprise especially with the outcome of the Olympics gymnastics terms giving Hamm the gold and sidestepping the issue with Tae-young. Was there dissappointment from the way the events turned out or do most Koreans not follow Olympic sports as much as the medals received to prove their stature in the world society? Personally, my heart went out to Tae-young especially after his performance. How was it received in Korea?


Korea in gymnast appeal
Silver medallist Kim Dae Eun, gold medallist Paul Hamm and bronze medallist Yang Tae Young
South Korea have appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) over a judging error which cost Yang Tae-young a gymnastics gold.

Three judges were suspended on Saturday for the mistake which saw American Paul Hamm win the men's all-round event.

The International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) upheld Tae-young's protest but said they could not change the outcome.

"We want this obvious misjudgment to be corrected," a South Korea statement said. "We want fairness and justice."

The judges denied Tae-young a tenth of a point from his parallel bars routine - the same margin which would have seen him upgraded from bronze to gold.

"The judges' marks have to be accepted as a final decision and cannot be changed," said the FIG in a statement.

But South Korea are determined to take the case to sport's highest legal body.

"FIG's sanction against judges who have not judged correctly is not enough for us to accept," South Korea added in a statement.

"While misjudgments are being repeated continuously, athletes are being sacrificed continuously."

However, a Cas spokesman said the court did not normally adjudicate on disputes over a scoring issue.

"Cas practice is quite clear," he said. "It refuses to enter into a scoring dispute unless there's been a case of bribery and this is not the case regarding the gymnastics dispute.

"But we will look at the case once it is filed."

Hamm says he will abide by any decision from the officials.

"If they decide I should give back the gold medal, then I will," he said.

"I personally believe I'm still the Olympic champion."

FIG rules do not allow for a protest against judges' marks
FIG statement
Yang received a start value of 9.9 on his parallel bars routine, a tenth lower than he received for the same set in team qualifying and finals.

After reviewing the results, FIG officials confirmed he should have been awarded a start value of 10.

He scored a 9.712 on the event, but with the extra .1, he would have finished with 57.874 points and defeated Hamm by .051.

Hamm won the meet over another South Korean Kim Dae-eun by .012 in the closest men's all-around competition in Olympic history.

He became the first American to win the title, with Yang finishing third, another .037 behind Kim.

The South Korean delegation asked for a review of the scoring after the meet, and the sport's governing body met on Friday to look at the tapes.

A official statement announcing its decision said: "The judges' error is confirmed by the FIG.

"In order to protect the integrity of the FIG, the judges, and to be able to maintain and ensure the highest possible judging standard at the Olympic Games, the FIG executive committee has decided to suspend the three technical officials concerned pending inquiry.

"The FIG rules do not allow for a protest against judges' marks."

The FIG did not release the names of the suspended judges, who will not be on the panel for Monday's event finals.

(EB)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home